Enough is Enough, It's Time for Bush to GO

Published on November 1, 2005 By AsWayOpens In Current Events

What will it take to get him investigated?
What will it take to get him out?

Obviously, the elections next year might help some, if the votes are actually counted, and counted not by machines that conservative corporations own.

How many of us really think he is thinking for himself?
How many of us see what happens when he does think for himself?

Now is the time for America to rise up and say no more.
Now is the time for America to demand action.
Now is the time for the filibusters.

Comments (Page 2)

AsWayOpens

on Nov 01, 2005

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.

drmiler

on Nov 01, 2005

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.

"When" and if you show us some, we might.

Dr Guy

on Nov 01, 2005

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.

Just as a word of enlightenment. Blogs, and Opinion Pieces are not facts. So dont give us links to the NY Times Maureen Dowd or du.org.

Draginol

on Nov 01, 2005

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts.

If you had facts, you would be able to quickly list them off. You have opinions, not facts.

bakerstreet

on Nov 01, 2005

And he tears on over to DU to start the copy/paste fest. Talk about blinders. I think it is pretty obvious here who has skimmed the propaganda and believed it without bothering to even soak in the lies...

Someone tells you "Bush should be impeached", but they can't tell you why, and they accuse other people of wearing blinders. lol...

Island Dog

on Nov 01, 2005

Sure, I have a lot. And I'll be back later to state them. I guess I have to accept the fact that not everyone sees the facts

We are waiting for you to provide your "facts". Please show me where Bush lied, or what crime he committed.

Dr Guy

on Nov 01, 2005

If you had facts, you would be able to quickly list them off. You have opinions, not facts.

Cut to the heart and insightful!

bakerstreet

on Nov 01, 2005

"If you had facts, you would be able to quickly list them off. You have opinions, not facts.

I wonder, if opinions were facts, would Clinton have ever even gotten through the Vince Foster/Whitewater period? I doubt we'd have ever heard of Monica L., he would have been in jail long before. Based on opinions, mind you.

Based on opinions, Chappaquiddick Ted would have had a very different life, as well. I think Bush haters would fare as bad or worse if they started using popular suspicion as cause for action...

Island Dog

on Nov 02, 2005

I'm still waiting for his proof of the "Bush lies". This is so typical. Accuse Bush of lying, but when it comes time to offer proof, they disappear.

AsWayOpens

on Nov 03, 2005

No, I'm short on time, not short on proof.

Are you all seriously happy with the path we are on?

Dr Guy

on Nov 03, 2005

Are you all seriously happy with the path we are on?

It beats the alternative.

AsWayOpens

on Nov 03, 2005

You must at least acknowledge that there are enough facts to warrant investigating, right?

There are serious questions about the two elections that voted him in.
There are serious questions about the war in Iraq.
There are serious questions about many of the people surrounding him.

There are many serious issues that deserve a closer look. There are lives at stake here.

Dr Guy

on Nov 03, 2005

There are serious questions about the two elections that voted him in.

Answered by the NY Times, Miami Herald, and USA Today in 2000. There were none in 2004 except in Wisconsin where 3 Democrat Operatives where found to have slashed a bunch of tires on Republican Vans.

There are serious questions about the war in Iraq.

Clarification - The Intel leading up to the war. There are no serious questions about the war. It is history. And the INtel has been investigated already.

There are serious questions about many of the people surrounding him.

They are entitled to their private lives after all, so why shouldn't there be? However, if you are insinuating illegal activities, then you are sorely mistaken. Anyone can alledge anything about anybody. However in our society, we have a thing called the rule of law. Since no evidence exists to even start an investigation, our constitution protects them from said allegations.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!