Sen. Feingold's Bill to Censure Bush!

Published on March 13, 2006 By AsWayOpens In Politics

Once he makes it to the floor to introduce it, call or write your representatives to back it!
Nobody should be above the law and this is the very least we can do.

Comments (Page 3)

DJBandit

on Mar 15, 2006

Well, I guess it has been decided then.
Lazy, I am not. Limited on time, I am.

I get your point, but there is always time. NOthing that can't wait a littlke while to be done. OK, I take back the lazy thing and I appologize, you gotta understand it's not the first time and you know it. But I'll keep in mind the time thing next time.

I also assume that others have the ability to read and see what I do, to look up issues brought up. I mean, are you all just going to go on the writer's blog or are you going to look into it for yourselfs?

Everyone here has the ability to research anything posted here, the trick is to know what to look for. When debating about a particular article like this one, one has to know where exactly did you get the info to come to the conclusion you did. Why should I have to search for something that you are claiming, you should be the one to provide the link since it was you who brought it up.

I've written a few brief things that have brought about discussions, other than my blogging style.
Now, may I ask how I put this on my blog page?

Exactly and they have been good ones, but they mostly have one thing in common that has been mentioned in most of them, the lack of info from the article itself. Nothing but a title and a short opinion on the matter but no one knows what exactly you are pointing to, especially when there is no link to your story.

It opens up investigating it. The Republicans have done everything they can to stop an open investigation.

It makes no difference, the word is out and an investigation will be on the way no matter what. This looks more like an act of desperation, the chance of sticking it to Bush is quickly fading and they needed something to bring it back into focus to continue to search for a way to get Bush into trouble. Kinda like loking inside a truck filled with thousands of soda cans looking for that 1 can that is messed up in order to get someone in trouble.

Then why do they find it necessary to change the law?

So that the Dems don't have an excuse to make such a big fuzz next time. It's not about changing it to make cover up Bush, it's more of so that it's much clearer next time around.

davad70

on Mar 15, 2006

Did you actually read his post?

Once he makes it to the floor to introduce it, call or write your representatives to back it!
Nobody should be above the law and this is the very least we can do.

What research is required? What debate is required? He made a post urging people to contact their reps to back it. What exactly would you have him document about his statement?

Dr Guy

on Mar 15, 2006

That's why there are so many Republicans who frown on the administration's arrogance in skirting the law.

You see that is where I differ with you and the democrats. I think he is innocent and has not skirted any laws. No evidence has been presented to show or prove he has. But since the allegations mean more than the evidence, the democrats like Feingold figure he must be guilty due to the seriousness of the charges.

You like to quote amendments. Try looking that one up. I think it is under the heading of innocent until proven guilty.

davad70

on Mar 15, 2006

No evidence has been presented to show or prove he has.

There has been a lot of evidence, you as well as the majority of congress (who hold all the cards to do something), just choose to ignore it.

AsWayOpens

on Mar 15, 2006

I accept your apology for calling me lazy.

Two more Senators have joined the call for censure!!

bakerstreet

on Mar 15, 2006

"There has been a lot of evidence, you as well as the majority of congress (who hold all the cards to do something), just choose to ignore it."

When you have real evidence, you seek indictments and put people in jail. When you have rumor and twisted facts and political propaganda, you have a couple of senate hearings and try and "censure" people. If you think the Dems wouldn't slap the cuffs on anyone in the Bush administration they could get their hands on, you're nuts. If they had it, they'd use it. They don't, though, and legal experts can't even agree as to whether this is permitted.

"Two more Senators have joined the call for censure!!"

Which ones, just wasted another 10 minutes trying to find out online and can't find anything to do with it. You could at least say who they are.

davad70

on Mar 15, 2006

If you think the Dems wouldn't slap the cuffs on anyone in the Bush administration they could get their hands on, you're nuts. If they had it, they'd use it. They don't, though, and legal experts can't even agree as to whether this is permitted.

How exactly would the dems go about slapping cuffs on anyone? Who appointed the AG? You really think Gonzales is going to slap cuffs on Bush for anything?

Which ones, just wasted another 10 minutes trying to find out online and can't find anything to do with it. You could at least say who they are.

I know for sure Harkin is no co-sponsoring the resolution. Link I think Boxer and Chaffee have said they'll vote for it.

bakerstreet

on Mar 15, 2006

lol, i love conspiracy theorist. Oddly enough we were able to commence proceedings against Clinton, haul him in and let him commit purgery based on a bj. If you think they couldn't make a stink that the justice department couldn't ignore, again, you're a loon.

"I know for sure Harkin is no co-sponsoring the resolution. Link I think Boxer and Chaffee have said they'll vote for it."

lol, these people have said they'd vote for it IF IT COMES UP to a vote. read that as exactly what it says. It's easy to say that knowing it will never come up. The big names in the party will barely even comment on it.

Ask yourself what these empty-headed twits are going to debate for weeks when legal scholars can't even decide. For every legal authority that says this was wrong there's another who says it wasn't. You guys can't get enough evidence to do anything tangible, so you'll grandstand and try to make people think it is obvious.

Rightwinger

on Mar 15, 2006

Too bad no one's rushing breathlessly to back him as fast as you breathlessly ran to post this. Even Dingy Harry is treading lightly on this one.

davad70

on Mar 15, 2006

lol, these people have said they'd vote for it IF IT COMES UP to a vote. read that as exactly what it says

Isn't that what I said...that they'd vote for it?

bakerstreet

on Mar 15, 2006

It's easy to say you'd vote for something when you know you'll never be asked to. Heck, if you can get Ted Kennedy into the 2008 election, I'll vote for him, and if I can get them to dig up Reagan you'll vote for him. Deal?

davad70

on Mar 15, 2006

Which ones, just wasted another 10 minutes trying to find out online and can't find anything to do with it. You could at least say who they are.

I was merely trying to help you since you said you couldn't find anything on it. No need to be a jackass.

Rightwinger

on Mar 15, 2006

Well Baker, I can honestly, and with not one reservation, say that I'll never again vote Bush for President.

singrdave

on Mar 15, 2006

But since the allegations mean more than the evidence, the democrats like Feingold figure he must be guilty due to the seriousness of the charges.

Remember, it's not about guilt or innocence -- it's the weight of the accusations!

bakerstreet

on Mar 15, 2006

" Well Baker, I can honestly, and with not one reservation, say that I'll never again vote Bush for President."

Me neither. There is a 0% chance I'll ever be voting for George Bush again.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!